DocketBreeze
See more sample cases Start free trial

Joseph Edgar Foreman (Afroman) vs. Adams County Police Officers

CVH 20230069 The case proceeded through pleadings, discovery, dispositive motions, and a jury trial. Some claims and counterclaims were dismissed on motion or voluntarily. The jury found in favor of Defendant Joseph Foreman on all claims. The court entered judgment for the defendant, denied injunctive relief, and split costs. The case is closed. Judgment Filed Mar 13, 2023

Several law enforcement officers filed a civil complaint against Joseph Edgar Foreman (aka Afroman), Hungry Hustler Records, Media Access Inc., and several John Doe defendants, alleging unauthorized commercial use of their personas, invasion of privacy, false light publicity, and unreasonable publicity of private lives. Plaintiffs seek damages and injunctive relief to prevent further violations.

Document details

View Download Back to docket

image.20260320225310906214.pdf

Document type
Answer
Title
DEFENDANT JOSEPH EDGAR FOREMAN'S REQUESTED RESPONSE TO JUDGMENT ENTRY FILE STAMPED JANUARY 20, 2026
Summary
This document is a reply from Joseph Edgar Foreman, who is the defendant in the case. His attorney is addressing a decision made by Judge Jonathan P. Hein, asking for more details about the reasons behind the defendant's claims according to Ohio law. The filing includes legal arguments and references to previous cases related to issues like trespassing on property, taking someone's belongings without permission, and violations of rights. It also shows that the document has been shared with the other lawyer and relevant parties involved in the case.
Filing date
Thursday, 22 January 2026