DocketBreeze
See more sample cases Start free trial

Joseph Edgar Foreman (Afroman) vs. Adams County Police Officers

CVH 20230069 The case proceeded through pleadings, discovery, dispositive motions, and a jury trial. Some claims and counterclaims were dismissed on motion or voluntarily. The jury found in favor of Defendant Joseph Foreman on all claims. The court entered judgment for the defendant, denied injunctive relief, and split costs. The case is closed. Judgment Filed Mar 13, 2023

Several law enforcement officers filed a civil complaint against Joseph Edgar Foreman (aka Afroman), Hungry Hustler Records, Media Access Inc., and several John Doe defendants, alleging unauthorized commercial use of their personas, invasion of privacy, false light publicity, and unreasonable publicity of private lives. Plaintiffs seek damages and injunctive relief to prevent further violations.

Document details

View Download Back to docket

image.20260320225438958605.pdf

Document type
Motion
Title
DEFENDANT JOSEPH EDGAR FOREMAN'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY AND REPORT OF DETECTIVE MICHEAL ROBINSON
Summary
This is a request made by Joseph Edgar Foreman, who is the defendant, asking the court to not allow Detective Michael Robinson's testimony and report to be used in the trial. Foreman argues that the information about the detective was given too late, which hurt his ability to prepare for the case. He also asks for more time to question the detective if necessary. The request includes additional documents to support his argument.
Filing date
Sunday, 15 March 2026