DocketBreeze
See more sample cases Start free trial

Joseph Edgar Foreman (Afroman) vs. Adams County Police Officers

CVH 20230069 The case proceeded through pleadings, discovery, dispositive motions, and a jury trial. Some claims and counterclaims were dismissed on motion or voluntarily. The jury found in favor of Defendant Joseph Foreman on all claims. The court entered judgment for the defendant, denied injunctive relief, and split costs. The case is closed. Judgment Filed Mar 13, 2023

Several law enforcement officers filed a civil complaint against Joseph Edgar Foreman (aka Afroman), Hungry Hustler Records, Media Access Inc., and several John Doe defendants, alleging unauthorized commercial use of their personas, invasion of privacy, false light publicity, and unreasonable publicity of private lives. Plaintiffs seek damages and injunctive relief to prevent further violations.

Document details

View Download Back to docket

image.20260320225301748120.pdf

Document type
Notice
Title
Notice of Intent to Rule on Pending Motion
Summary
This document is a message from the court letting everyone know that it plans to make a decision about the defendant's request to throw out the case because not everyone needed to be included was brought in. The court has also set a deadline for any responses to this request and mentioned that it will make its decision based on the written arguments provided, unless someone gives a good reason for needing a hearing to present more evidence.
Filing date
Friday, 16 January 2026