DocketBreeze
See more sample cases Start free trial

Joseph Edgar Foreman (Afroman) vs. Adams County Police Officers

CVH 20230069 The case proceeded through pleadings, discovery, dispositive motions, and a jury trial. Some claims and counterclaims were dismissed on motion or voluntarily. The jury found in favor of Defendant Joseph Foreman on all claims. The court entered judgment for the defendant, denied injunctive relief, and split costs. The case is closed. Judgment Filed Mar 13, 2023

Several law enforcement officers filed a civil complaint against Joseph Edgar Foreman (aka Afroman), Hungry Hustler Records, Media Access Inc., and several John Doe defendants, alleging unauthorized commercial use of their personas, invasion of privacy, false light publicity, and unreasonable publicity of private lives. Plaintiffs seek damages and injunctive relief to prevent further violations.

Document details

View Download Back to docket

image.20260320225013669001.pdf

Document type
Other
Title
JOINT STIPULATION OF PLAINTIFFS AND DEFENDANTS TO STAY DISCOVERY AS TO DEFENDANTS' COUNTERCLAIMS
Summary
Both the plaintiffs and defendants have agreed to pause gathering information about the defendants' counterclaims while the court decides on certain legal arguments about immunity related to the plaintiffs' request for a judgment. However, they will continue to gather information about the plaintiffs' claims and the defendants' defenses. This pause is meant to save time and resources, not to hold up the case.
Filing date
Friday, 20 March 2026