DocketBreeze
See more sample cases Start free trial

Joseph Edgar Foreman (Afroman) vs. Adams County Police Officers

CVH 20230069 The case proceeded through pleadings, discovery, dispositive motions, and a jury trial. Some claims and counterclaims were dismissed on motion or voluntarily. The jury found in favor of Defendant Joseph Foreman on all claims. The court entered judgment for the defendant, denied injunctive relief, and split costs. The case is closed. Judgment Filed Mar 13, 2023

Several law enforcement officers filed a civil complaint against Joseph Edgar Foreman (aka Afroman), Hungry Hustler Records, Media Access Inc., and several John Doe defendants, alleging unauthorized commercial use of their personas, invasion of privacy, false light publicity, and unreasonable publicity of private lives. Plaintiffs seek damages and injunctive relief to prevent further violations.

Document details

View Download Back to docket

image.20260320224736515391.pdf

Document type
Other
Title
BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF OHIO FOUNDATION AND AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT
Summary
The ACLU and the ACLU of Ohio have filed a document to support the defendants in the case. They argue that the police officers who are suing are trying to stop Joseph Foreman (Afroman) from criticizing them about a police search of his home. The ACLU believes that what Foreman said and shared publicly is protected by the First Amendment, meaning he has the right to speak freely and that the police officers' claims of invasion of privacy or other complaints should not hold up in court.
Filing date
Friday, 20 March 2026