DocketBreeze
See more sample cases Start free trial

Joseph Edgar Foreman (Afroman) vs. Adams County Police Officers

CVH 20230069 The case proceeded through pleadings, discovery, dispositive motions, and a jury trial. Some claims and counterclaims were dismissed on motion or voluntarily. The jury found in favor of Defendant Joseph Foreman on all claims. The court entered judgment for the defendant, denied injunctive relief, and split costs. The case is closed. Judgment Filed Mar 13, 2023

Several law enforcement officers filed a civil complaint against Joseph Edgar Foreman (aka Afroman), Hungry Hustler Records, Media Access Inc., and several John Doe defendants, alleging unauthorized commercial use of their personas, invasion of privacy, false light publicity, and unreasonable publicity of private lives. Plaintiffs seek damages and injunctive relief to prevent further violations.

Document details

View Download Back to docket

image.20260320224859974564.pdf

Document type
Motion
Title
MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT
Summary
Joseph E. Foreman and Hungry Hustler Records, acting as the Defendant in the case, have asked the court for permission to make changes to their earlier response to the lawsuit. They want to add new reasons for why they believe they shouldn't be held responsible and to bring up some new legal claims. In their request, they argue that these changes are important and fair. They've also included a document explaining their reasons and proof that they've shared this information with the other parties involved.
Filing date
Tuesday, 05 December 2023