DocketBreeze
See more sample cases Start free trial

Joseph Edgar Foreman (Afroman) vs. Adams County Police Officers

CVH 20230069 The case proceeded through pleadings, discovery, dispositive motions, and a jury trial. Some claims and counterclaims were dismissed on motion or voluntarily. The jury found in favor of Defendant Joseph Foreman on all claims. The court entered judgment for the defendant, denied injunctive relief, and split costs. The case is closed. Judgment Filed Mar 13, 2023

Several law enforcement officers filed a civil complaint against Joseph Edgar Foreman (aka Afroman), Hungry Hustler Records, Media Access Inc., and several John Doe defendants, alleging unauthorized commercial use of their personas, invasion of privacy, false light publicity, and unreasonable publicity of private lives. Plaintiffs seek damages and injunctive relief to prevent further violations.

Document details

View Download Back to docket

image.20260320225326128359.pdf

Document type
Other
Title
PLAINTIFFS' BRIEF IN RESPONSE TO COURT ORDER AS TO DEFENDANT'S COUNTERCLAIMS
Summary
The Plaintiffs have filed a written response to a court request about the Defendant's claims against them. In this response, they explain that some of the Defendant's claims should not be allowed because they were brought too late. They ask the court to dismiss certain claims and argue that the Defendant's claims are unrelated to the original issue between the Plaintiffs and the Defendant.
Filing date
Sunday, 08 February 2026