DocketBreeze
See more sample cases Start free trial

Joseph Edgar Foreman (Afroman) vs. Adams County Police Officers

CVH 20230069 The case proceeded through pleadings, discovery, dispositive motions, and a jury trial. Some claims and counterclaims were dismissed on motion or voluntarily. The jury found in favor of Defendant Joseph Foreman on all claims. The court entered judgment for the defendant, denied injunctive relief, and split costs. The case is closed. Judgment Filed Mar 13, 2023

Several law enforcement officers filed a civil complaint against Joseph Edgar Foreman (aka Afroman), Hungry Hustler Records, Media Access Inc., and several John Doe defendants, alleging unauthorized commercial use of their personas, invasion of privacy, false light publicity, and unreasonable publicity of private lives. Plaintiffs seek damages and injunctive relief to prevent further violations.

Document details

View Download Back to docket

image.20260320225010866495.pdf

Document type
Answer
Title
DEFENDANT'S JOESPH E. FOREMAN AND HUNGRY HUSTLER RECORDS RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY
Summary
This document is a reply from Joseph E. Foreman and Hungry Hustler Records to the other side's request to pause the discovery process. The Defendants agree to hold off on gathering evidence related to their counterclaim until the court makes a decision on the other side's motion for judgment.
Filing date
Monday, 17 June 2024