DocketBreeze
See more sample cases Start free trial

Joseph Edgar Foreman (Afroman) vs. Adams County Police Officers

CVH 20230069 The case proceeded through pleadings, discovery, dispositive motions, and a jury trial. Some claims and counterclaims were dismissed on motion or voluntarily. The jury found in favor of Defendant Joseph Foreman on all claims. The court entered judgment for the defendant, denied injunctive relief, and split costs. The case is closed. Judgment Filed Mar 13, 2023

Several law enforcement officers filed a civil complaint against Joseph Edgar Foreman (aka Afroman), Hungry Hustler Records, Media Access Inc., and several John Doe defendants, alleging unauthorized commercial use of their personas, invasion of privacy, false light publicity, and unreasonable publicity of private lives. Plaintiffs seek damages and injunctive relief to prevent further violations.

Document details

View Download Back to docket

image.20260320225048961256.pdf

Document type
Motion
Title
PLAINTIFFS' REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AS TO DEFENDANTS' COUNTERCLAIMS
Summary
The Plaintiffs have filed a response to the Defendants' claims against them. They believe that the Defendants haven't provided good enough reasons to challenge their arguments about being protected from the claims. The Plaintiffs also argue that the Defendants' claims don't have enough legal ground or facts to stand on. They are asking the court to rule in their favor and dismiss all the Defendants' claims.
Filing date
Sunday, 07 July 2024