DocketBreeze
See more sample cases Start free trial

Joseph Edgar Foreman (Afroman) vs. Adams County Police Officers

CVH 20230069 The case proceeded through pleadings, discovery, dispositive motions, and a jury trial. Some claims and counterclaims were dismissed on motion or voluntarily. The jury found in favor of Defendant Joseph Foreman on all claims. The court entered judgment for the defendant, denied injunctive relief, and split costs. The case is closed. Judgment Filed Mar 13, 2023

Several law enforcement officers filed a civil complaint against Joseph Edgar Foreman (aka Afroman), Hungry Hustler Records, Media Access Inc., and several John Doe defendants, alleging unauthorized commercial use of their personas, invasion of privacy, false light publicity, and unreasonable publicity of private lives. Plaintiffs seek damages and injunctive relief to prevent further violations.

Document details

View Download Back to docket

image.20260320225039014665.pdf

Document type
Order
Title
ENTRY DISMISSING DEFENDANT'S COUNTERCLAIMS 9, 10, and 11
Summary
A judge has officially decided to throw out certain claims made by the defendant, Joseph E. Foreman, and Hungry Hustler Records, specifically claims 9, 10, and 11. This dismissal is "without prejudice," meaning they can potentially bring these claims up again in the future if they choose to. The order was signed by Judge Jerry McBride, and copies of this decision will be sent to everyone involved in the case.
Filing date
Thursday, 04 July 2024