DocketBreeze
See more sample cases Start free trial

Joseph Edgar Foreman (Afroman) vs. Adams County Police Officers

CVH 20230069 The case proceeded through pleadings, discovery, dispositive motions, and a jury trial. Some claims and counterclaims were dismissed on motion or voluntarily. The jury found in favor of Defendant Joseph Foreman on all claims. The court entered judgment for the defendant, denied injunctive relief, and split costs. The case is closed. Judgment Filed Mar 13, 2023

Several law enforcement officers filed a civil complaint against Joseph Edgar Foreman (aka Afroman), Hungry Hustler Records, Media Access Inc., and several John Doe defendants, alleging unauthorized commercial use of their personas, invasion of privacy, false light publicity, and unreasonable publicity of private lives. Plaintiffs seek damages and injunctive relief to prevent further violations.

Document details

View Download Back to docket

image.20260320224921765981.pdf

Document type
Motion
Title
DEFENDANT'S JOESPH E. FOREMAN AND HUNGRY HUSTLER RECORDS MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
Summary
Joseph E. Foreman and Hungry Hustler Records have asked the court to remove or disregard the Plaintiffs' updated complaint, claiming it was filed too late and without getting permission from the court first. In their request, they explain the rules that support their argument and say that the way the Plaintiffs changed their complaint was not correct. They also included a document that shows who was informed about this motion and how they were notified.
Filing date
Tuesday, 26 December 2023