DocketBreeze
See more sample cases Start free trial

Joseph Edgar Foreman (Afroman) vs. Adams County Police Officers

CVH 20230069 The case proceeded through pleadings, discovery, dispositive motions, and a jury trial. Some claims and counterclaims were dismissed on motion or voluntarily. The jury found in favor of Defendant Joseph Foreman on all claims. The court entered judgment for the defendant, denied injunctive relief, and split costs. The case is closed. Judgment Filed Mar 13, 2023

Several law enforcement officers filed a civil complaint against Joseph Edgar Foreman (aka Afroman), Hungry Hustler Records, Media Access Inc., and several John Doe defendants, alleging unauthorized commercial use of their personas, invasion of privacy, false light publicity, and unreasonable publicity of private lives. Plaintiffs seek damages and injunctive relief to prevent further violations.

Document details

View Download Back to docket

image.20260320224916350707.pdf

Document type
Order
Title
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE
Summary
This order allows attorney Vera Eidelman to represent the defendant in the case of Cooley v. Foreman, even though she is not based in Ohio. However, she must work together with a local Ohio attorney and follow the state's rules. The order also requires that copies be sent to everyone involved in the case, and the court will inform Eidelman about any upcoming meetings or events related to the case.
Filing date
Wednesday, 17 May 2023