DocketBreeze
See more sample cases Start free trial

Joseph Edgar Foreman (Afroman) vs. Adams County Police Officers

CVH 20230069 The case proceeded through pleadings, discovery, dispositive motions, and a jury trial. Some claims and counterclaims were dismissed on motion or voluntarily. The jury found in favor of Defendant Joseph Foreman on all claims. The court entered judgment for the defendant, denied injunctive relief, and split costs. The case is closed. Judgment Filed Mar 13, 2023

Several law enforcement officers filed a civil complaint against Joseph Edgar Foreman (aka Afroman), Hungry Hustler Records, Media Access Inc., and several John Doe defendants, alleging unauthorized commercial use of their personas, invasion of privacy, false light publicity, and unreasonable publicity of private lives. Plaintiffs seek damages and injunctive relief to prevent further violations.

Document details

View Download Back to docket

image.20260320224754101420.pdf

Document type
Motion
Title
MOTION FOR PERMISSION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE
Summary
This document is a request from Vera Eidelman, a lawyer who isn’t based in this state, asking for special permission to represent a group called amici curiae (which means "friends of the court") in the case Shawn D. Cooley et al. v. Joseph Edgar Foreman et al. The filing includes documents to support her request and proof that all involved parties have received this information.
Filing date
Tuesday, 18 April 2023