DocketBreeze
See more sample cases Start free trial

Joseph Edgar Foreman (Afroman) vs. Adams County Police Officers

CVH 20230069 The case proceeded through pleadings, discovery, dispositive motions, and a jury trial. Some claims and counterclaims were dismissed on motion or voluntarily. The jury found in favor of Defendant Joseph Foreman on all claims. The court entered judgment for the defendant, denied injunctive relief, and split costs. The case is closed. Judgment Filed Mar 13, 2023

Several law enforcement officers filed a civil complaint against Joseph Edgar Foreman (aka Afroman), Hungry Hustler Records, Media Access Inc., and several John Doe defendants, alleging unauthorized commercial use of their personas, invasion of privacy, false light publicity, and unreasonable publicity of private lives. Plaintiffs seek damages and injunctive relief to prevent further violations.

Document details

View Download Back to docket

image.20260320224924306995.pdf

Document type
Motion
Title
DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS' MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COUNTERCLAIMS, INSTANTER
Summary
This document is the Defendants’ reply to the Plaintiffs’ argument against letting the Defendants change their counterclaims. It goes over what has happened in the case so far, discusses some legal notification issues, and asks the court for permission to submit a revised version of their counterclaims. It also includes supportive information and proof that the document was properly shared with the involved parties.
Filing date
Tuesday, 26 December 2023