DocketBreeze
See more sample cases Start free trial

Joseph Edgar Foreman (Afroman) vs. Adams County Police Officers

CVH 20230069 The case proceeded through pleadings, discovery, dispositive motions, and a jury trial. Some claims and counterclaims were dismissed on motion or voluntarily. The jury found in favor of Defendant Joseph Foreman on all claims. The court entered judgment for the defendant, denied injunctive relief, and split costs. The case is closed. Judgment Filed Mar 13, 2023

Several law enforcement officers filed a civil complaint against Joseph Edgar Foreman (aka Afroman), Hungry Hustler Records, Media Access Inc., and several John Doe defendants, alleging unauthorized commercial use of their personas, invasion of privacy, false light publicity, and unreasonable publicity of private lives. Plaintiffs seek damages and injunctive relief to prevent further violations.

Document details

View Download Back to docket

image.20260320225418311281.pdf

Document type
Motion
Title
PLAINTIFFS' MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE IRRELEVANT EVIDENCE
Summary
The Plaintiffs are asking the court to not allow certain evidence and witnesses suggested by the Defendant because they believe it doesn't relate to the case or could unfairly influence the jury. This includes things like music videos, a flyer, and some statements. They want the court to set limits on what can be shown during the trial and to completely keep out some items to avoid any confusion or bias. They have provided a detailed explanation to support their request.
Filing date
Wednesday, 11 March 2026