DocketBreeze
See more sample cases Start free trial

Joseph Edgar Foreman (Afroman) vs. Adams County Police Officers

CVH 20230069 The case proceeded through pleadings, discovery, dispositive motions, and a jury trial. Some claims and counterclaims were dismissed on motion or voluntarily. The jury found in favor of Defendant Joseph Foreman on all claims. The court entered judgment for the defendant, denied injunctive relief, and split costs. The case is closed. Judgment Filed Mar 13, 2023

Several law enforcement officers filed a civil complaint against Joseph Edgar Foreman (aka Afroman), Hungry Hustler Records, Media Access Inc., and several John Doe defendants, alleging unauthorized commercial use of their personas, invasion of privacy, false light publicity, and unreasonable publicity of private lives. Plaintiffs seek damages and injunctive relief to prevent further violations.

Document details

View Download Back to docket

image.20260320224953182238.pdf

Document type
Motion
Title
MOTION FOR COURT TO ADOPT THE PROPOSED JOINT STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER
Summary
The plaintiffs have submitted a request to the court asking it to approve a protective order. This order is meant to keep sensitive information safe during the case and is included with the request. It outlines how to identify, manage, and dispute any confidential or strictly private information shared during the discovery process. Essentially, this is a plan to protect important details from being improperly shared.
Filing date
Sunday, 10 March 2024