DocketBreeze
See more sample cases Start free trial

Joseph Edgar Foreman (Afroman) vs. Adams County Police Officers

CVH 20230069 The case proceeded through pleadings, discovery, dispositive motions, and a jury trial. Some claims and counterclaims were dismissed on motion or voluntarily. The jury found in favor of Defendant Joseph Foreman on all claims. The court entered judgment for the defendant, denied injunctive relief, and split costs. The case is closed. Judgment Filed Mar 13, 2023

Several law enforcement officers filed a civil complaint against Joseph Edgar Foreman (aka Afroman), Hungry Hustler Records, Media Access Inc., and several John Doe defendants, alleging unauthorized commercial use of their personas, invasion of privacy, false light publicity, and unreasonable publicity of private lives. Plaintiffs seek damages and injunctive relief to prevent further violations.

Document details

View Download Back to docket

image.20260320225029478253.pdf

Document type
Motion
Title
DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT'S COUNTERCLAIMS 9, 10, and 11
Summary
Joseph E. Foreman and Hungry Hustler Records, who are being sued in this case, have filed a request with the court asking to throw out their own counterclaims numbered 9, 10, and 11. They want to do this without any negative consequences, meaning they can bring them up again later if needed. They have also provided proof that they informed the other side, the opposing lawyer, about this request.
Filing date
Monday, 24 June 2024