DocketBreeze
See more sample cases Start free trial

Joseph Edgar Foreman (Afroman) vs. Adams County Police Officers

CVH 20230069 The case proceeded through pleadings, discovery, dispositive motions, and a jury trial. Some claims and counterclaims were dismissed on motion or voluntarily. The jury found in favor of Defendant Joseph Foreman on all claims. The court entered judgment for the defendant, denied injunctive relief, and split costs. The case is closed. Judgment Filed Mar 13, 2023

Several law enforcement officers filed a civil complaint against Joseph Edgar Foreman (aka Afroman), Hungry Hustler Records, Media Access Inc., and several John Doe defendants, alleging unauthorized commercial use of their personas, invasion of privacy, false light publicity, and unreasonable publicity of private lives. Plaintiffs seek damages and injunctive relief to prevent further violations.

Document details

View Download Back to docket

image.20260320224729810947.pdf

Document type
Motion
Title
MEMORANDUM IN SUPORT OF MOTION TO INTERVENE
Summary
Arthur West has submitted a document to the court asking for permission to join the case involving Shawn D. Cooley and Joseph E. Foreman. He believes he has a right under the First Amendment to access certain music videos and materials related to the case. West feels that his interests aren't being represented by the current parties involved, so he wants to get involved. The document also shows that he has informed the lawyers for the other parties about his request via email on April 17, 2023.
Filing date
Monday, 17 April 2023