DocketBreeze
See more sample cases Start free trial

Joseph Edgar Foreman (Afroman) vs. Adams County Police Officers

CVH 20230069 The case proceeded through pleadings, discovery, dispositive motions, and a jury trial. Some claims and counterclaims were dismissed on motion or voluntarily. The jury found in favor of Defendant Joseph Foreman on all claims. The court entered judgment for the defendant, denied injunctive relief, and split costs. The case is closed. Judgment Filed Mar 13, 2023

Several law enforcement officers filed a civil complaint against Joseph Edgar Foreman (aka Afroman), Hungry Hustler Records, Media Access Inc., and several John Doe defendants, alleging unauthorized commercial use of their personas, invasion of privacy, false light publicity, and unreasonable publicity of private lives. Plaintiffs seek damages and injunctive relief to prevent further violations.

Document details

View Download Back to docket

image.20260320225022501120.pdf

Document type
Answer
Title
DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AS TO DEFENDANTS' COUNTERCLAIMS
Summary
This document is the Defendants' reply to the Plaintiffs' request for the court to rule in their favor based solely on the written statements in the case. The Defendants are saying that the Plaintiffs shouldn’t be protected from responsibility for what they did, and that there are still some disagreements about the facts that need to be resolved before any judgment can be made. The response explains the legal reasons for their position, provides background information about the facts of the case, and asks the court to reject the Plaintiffs' request.
Filing date
Monday, 24 June 2024