DocketBreeze

Joseph Edgar Foreman (Afroman) vs. Adams County Police Officers

CVH 20230069 The case proceeded through pleadings, discovery, dispositive motions, and a jury trial. Some claims and counterclaims were dismissed on motion or voluntarily. The jury found in favor of Defendant Joseph Foreman on all claims. The court entered judgment for the defendant, denied injunctive relief, and split costs. The case is closed. Judgment Filed Mar 13, 2023

Several law enforcement officers filed a civil complaint against Joseph Edgar Foreman (aka Afroman), Hungry Hustler Records, Media Access Inc., and several John Doe defendants, alleging unauthorized commercial use of their personas, invasion of privacy, false light publicity, and unreasonable publicity of private lives. Plaintiffs seek damages and injunctive relief to prevent further violations.

Document details

image.20260320225415445952.pdf

Document type
Other
Title
STIPULATIONS AS TO AUTHENTICITY
Summary
This document is an agreement between both sides in the case, the plaintiffs and defendants, stating that they accept certain pieces of evidence as real and trustworthy. This includes things like social media posts, music, videos, and police records. They agree not to question whether these pieces of evidence are authentic, but they can still raise other concerns about them. Both sides’ lawyers have signed this agreement.
Filing date
Thursday, 12 March 2026