DocketBreeze
See more sample cases Start free trial

Joseph Edgar Foreman (Afroman) vs. Adams County Police Officers

CVH 20230069 The case proceeded through pleadings, discovery, dispositive motions, and a jury trial. Some claims and counterclaims were dismissed on motion or voluntarily. The jury found in favor of Defendant Joseph Foreman on all claims. The court entered judgment for the defendant, denied injunctive relief, and split costs. The case is closed. Judgment Filed Mar 13, 2023

Several law enforcement officers filed a civil complaint against Joseph Edgar Foreman (aka Afroman), Hungry Hustler Records, Media Access Inc., and several John Doe defendants, alleging unauthorized commercial use of their personas, invasion of privacy, false light publicity, and unreasonable publicity of private lives. Plaintiffs seek damages and injunctive relief to prevent further violations.

Document details

View Download Back to docket

image.20260320224939399804.pdf

Document type
Order
Title
ENTRY NUNC PRO TUNC CORRECTING ERROR MADE IN PREVIOUS ENTRY
Summary
This document fixes a mistake in an earlier court entry about attorney Vera Eidelman's ability to represent a client in this case. It makes it clear that while she was allowed to join the case as a lawyer from another state, she was not allowed to act as a co-lawyer with the main attorney for the defendant, Joseph Edgar Foreman. The document confirms the accurate details from before and states that Eidelman must follow local rules to continue representing her client.
Filing date
Tuesday, 02 January 2024