DocketBreeze
See more sample cases Start free trial

Joseph Edgar Foreman (Afroman) vs. Adams County Police Officers

CVH 20230069 The case proceeded through pleadings, discovery, dispositive motions, and a jury trial. Some claims and counterclaims were dismissed on motion or voluntarily. The jury found in favor of Defendant Joseph Foreman on all claims. The court entered judgment for the defendant, denied injunctive relief, and split costs. The case is closed. Judgment Filed Mar 13, 2023

Several law enforcement officers filed a civil complaint against Joseph Edgar Foreman (aka Afroman), Hungry Hustler Records, Media Access Inc., and several John Doe defendants, alleging unauthorized commercial use of their personas, invasion of privacy, false light publicity, and unreasonable publicity of private lives. Plaintiffs seek damages and injunctive relief to prevent further violations.

Document details

View Download Back to docket

image.20260320224855897410.pdf

Document type
Answer
Title
PLAINTIFFS' ANSWER TO DEFENDANTS' COUNTERCLAIM
Summary
This document is the Plaintiffs' official response to the Defendants' claims against them. The Plaintiffs disagree with most of what the Defendants are saying, present some reasons why they believe they shouldn’t be held responsible, and ask the court to throw out the Defendants' claims completely. It also shows that they have shared this document with the other party and includes a request for a trial by jury.
Filing date
Tuesday, 21 November 2023