DocketBreeze
See more sample cases Start free trial

Joseph Edgar Foreman (Afroman) vs. Adams County Police Officers

CVH 20230069 The case proceeded through pleadings, discovery, dispositive motions, and a jury trial. Some claims and counterclaims were dismissed on motion or voluntarily. The jury found in favor of Defendant Joseph Foreman on all claims. The court entered judgment for the defendant, denied injunctive relief, and split costs. The case is closed. Judgment Filed Mar 13, 2023

Several law enforcement officers filed a civil complaint against Joseph Edgar Foreman (aka Afroman), Hungry Hustler Records, Media Access Inc., and several John Doe defendants, alleging unauthorized commercial use of their personas, invasion of privacy, false light publicity, and unreasonable publicity of private lives. Plaintiffs seek damages and injunctive relief to prevent further violations.

Document details

View Download Back to docket

image.20260320225443951997.pdf

Document type
Motion
Title
DEFENDANT JOSEPH EDGAR FOREMAN'S MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION IN LIMINE
Summary
Joseph Edgar Foreman, who is the defendant in this case, has filed a document that argues against the Plaintiffs' recent request to limit what the defense can present in court. The document says that the Plaintiffs' request is unclear and not detailed enough, and it unfairly tries to prevent the defense from sharing important information. Foreman is asking the court to reject the Plaintiffs' request.
Filing date
Monday, 16 March 2026