DocketBreeze
See more sample cases Start free trial

Joseph Edgar Foreman (Afroman) vs. Adams County Police Officers

CVH 20230069 The case proceeded through pleadings, discovery, dispositive motions, and a jury trial. Some claims and counterclaims were dismissed on motion or voluntarily. The jury found in favor of Defendant Joseph Foreman on all claims. The court entered judgment for the defendant, denied injunctive relief, and split costs. The case is closed. Judgment Filed Mar 13, 2023

Several law enforcement officers filed a civil complaint against Joseph Edgar Foreman (aka Afroman), Hungry Hustler Records, Media Access Inc., and several John Doe defendants, alleging unauthorized commercial use of their personas, invasion of privacy, false light publicity, and unreasonable publicity of private lives. Plaintiffs seek damages and injunctive relief to prevent further violations.

Document details

View Download Back to docket

image.20260320225510022492.pdf

Document type
Other
Title
Transcript of jury selection in Cooley v. Foreman, Case No. 2023-0069
Summary
This document is an email from attorney Robert Klingler to the court clerk. He is asking for a copy of the questions and answers that were used during jury selection on the morning of March 16, 2026, for the Cooley v. Foreman case. He wants the information quickly and prefers to receive it electronically.
Filing date
Wednesday, 18 March 2026