DocketBreeze
See more sample cases Start free trial

Mary K. Crocker-Wyss vs. Philip Briscoe, Pr, Et Al

23MA-CC00020 The case proceeded through multiple amended petitions and motions including motions to dismiss and for judgment on the pleadings. The court denied motions to dismiss and for judgment on the pleadings, granting Plaintiff leave to amend the petition. Defendant Brannon's motion to dismiss the Second Amended Petition was denied after hearing. The parties engaged in discovery and status conferences. Ultimately, Plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the action with prejudice on April 27, 2026. Filed Sep 19, 2023

Plaintiff Mary Kathryn Crocker-Wyss alleges legal malpractice and negligence against Defendants John W. Briscoe, Philip P. Briscoe as Personal Representative of the Estate of John Wilford Briscoe, Joseph A. Brannon, and Briscoe & Brannon partnership related to the drafting of beneficiary deeds affecting real property interests. The claims arise from the omission of an 80-acre parcel from a 2012 beneficiary deed, resulting in financial losses and property disposition inconsistent with Plaintiff's interests.

Document details

View Download Back to docket

DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS DUE TO PLAINTIFFS FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM.pdf

Document type
Motion
Title
DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS DUE TO PLAINTIFF'S FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM
Summary
The defendant asked the court to dismiss your case because they believe you have not provided enough valid reasons for your claim. They also argue that the time to bring this case has passed according to the law.
Filing date
Friday, 28 February 2025