DocketBreeze
See more sample cases Start free trial

Mary K. Crocker-Wyss vs. Philip Briscoe, Pr, Et Al

23MA-CC00020 The case proceeded through multiple amended petitions and motions including motions to dismiss and for judgment on the pleadings. The court denied motions to dismiss and for judgment on the pleadings, granting Plaintiff leave to amend the petition. Defendant Brannon's motion to dismiss the Second Amended Petition was denied after hearing. The parties engaged in discovery and status conferences. Ultimately, Plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the action with prejudice on April 27, 2026. Filed Sep 19, 2023

Plaintiff Mary Kathryn Crocker-Wyss alleges legal malpractice and negligence against Defendants John W. Briscoe, Philip P. Briscoe as Personal Representative of the Estate of John Wilford Briscoe, Joseph A. Brannon, and Briscoe & Brannon partnership related to the drafting of beneficiary deeds affecting real property interests. The claims arise from the omission of an 80-acre parcel from a 2012 beneficiary deed, resulting in financial losses and property disposition inconsistent with Plaintiff's interests.

Document details

View Download Back to docket

Plaintiffs Opposition to Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings or in the Alternative Motion for Leave to Amend.pdf

Document type
Motion
Title
Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings or in the Alternative, Motion for Leave to Amend
Summary
The plaintiff's attorney argues that the defendants' request to dismiss your case is not valid. They also ask to change the complaint if needed to better support your claim.
Filing date
Sunday, 10 March 2024