DocketBreeze
See more sample cases Start free trial

Paul Wikstrom vs. Curtis Johnson

62-CV-24-7378 The case proceeded through motions to dismiss, motions for default judgment, and motions in limine, all of which were denied by the District Court. An evidentiary hearing was held in December 2024. The District Court issued findings and conclusions regarding residency, and the case was appealed to the Minnesota Supreme Court. The Supreme Court denied discretionary review of the interlocutory order but allowed the laches issue to be raised on appeal from the final decision. The District Court ultimately ruled in favor of the contestant, declaring Johnson ineligible to serve. The case is currently on appeal. Filed Nov 20, 2024

An election contest filed by Paul Wikstrom challenging Curtis Johnson's eligibility to serve as State Representative for Minnesota House District 40B based on residency requirements. The contest alleges Johnson failed to meet the six-month residency requirement prior to the November 5, 2024 general election and requests invalidation of the election results.

Document details

View Download Back to docket

12.02.24-2-Proposed Order or Document.pdf

Document type
Order
Title
Order Granting Motion to Exclude Specific Evidence in Hearing
Summary
The judge decided that some evidence related to accusations against Curtis Johnson will not be shown at the hearing. This means those parts cannot be used to influence the decision in your case.
Filing date
—