DocketBreeze

Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, Et Al. vs. State of South Carolina, Et Al.

2024-000997 The case was appealed to the South Carolina Supreme Court, which granted pro hac vice admissions for several attorneys, set a condensed briefing schedule, and heard oral arguments. The Court issued an opinion affirming the lower court's ruling, interpreting the Act to prohibit most abortions after detection of cardiac activity at about six weeks. The case was remitted back to the lower court. Filed Jun 12, 2024

This case involves an appeal by Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, Dr. Katherine Farris, and Taylor Shelton challenging the enforcement and interpretation of South Carolina's 2023 Fetal Heartbeat and Protection from Abortion Act (S.B. 474), which bans abortion after detection of a fetal heartbeat, typically at approximately six weeks of pregnancy. The appellants seek reversal of the denial of a preliminary injunction, arguing the statute is ambiguous, unconstitutionally vague, and causes irreparable harm. The appellees, including the State of South Carolina and Attorney General Alan Wilson, support the Act's constitutionality and seek to uphold the lower court's decision.

Document details

08.30.2024-3-Brief of Respondent (Governor McMasters).pdf

Document type
Other
Title
BRIEF OF GOVERNOR McMASTER
Summary
Governor McMaster has shared his support for the 2023 South Carolina abortion law with the Supreme Court. This means your case involves important arguments about this law and efforts to keep it in place.
Filing date
Friday, 30 August 2024